تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

تست زدن و نحوه ی رفع اشکال

حتما برای چند بار اول که تست خواندن/Reading و درک مطلب بزنید، به این نتیجه می رسید که با روش خواندن ابتدا تا انتهای متن و بعد پاسخ گویی به سوالات و یا بالعکس (خواندن سوالات ابتدا و سپس پیدا کردن جواب در متن – که البته این روش بیشتر توصیه می شود و مفیدتر و سریع تر است – تفاوت زمانی چندانی ندارد و تقریبا باز هم وقت کم می آورید.

خبر خوب آن که این امر کاملا طبیعی است. دو نکته را مد نظر داشته باشید:
اول آن که پیشرفت در خواندن و کم کردن زمان در مهارت خواندن و درک مطلب به طرز قابل توجهی دیرتر از مهارت های دیگر اتفاق می افتد. به عنوان مثال بعد از دو ماه تمرین در مهارت شنیدن، پیشرفت شما به مراتب چشم گیرتر از دو ماه تمرین در مهارت خواندن خواهد بود. بنابراین باید زمان بیشتری را به خواندن اختصاص بدهید تا پیشرفت در این مهارت سریع تر رخ بدهد.

دوم آن که کاهش زمان به یک باره رخ نمی دهد و شما باید سعی کنید پس از هر بار تست زنی، البته در شرایط امتحانی، چند دقیقه از زمان خود کم کنید. دقت داشته باشید که کم کردن زمان فقط با مدیریت زمان ممکن است. به عنوان مثال سوالی که بیش از دو یا سه دقیقه وقت شما را گرفته است را رها کنید و بعدا اگر زمان داشتید و یا در پایان تست به آن مراجعه کنید.

در نهایت پس از مثلا بیست بار تمرین و تست زنی با کمک این تکنیک ها، شما به تدریج در مهارت خواندن به زمان کم تری نیاز داشته باشید.

هر روز یا حتی یک روز در میان تست آزمایشی نزنید. هفته ای یک تست آزمایشی کافی است. در این فاصله مطالعه و رفع اشکال کنید.

بعد از هر تست آزمایشی حتما دلایل اشتباهات خود را ریشه یابی کنید و درصورت لزوم حتما از یک کتاب گرامر، کتاب لغت مرتبط، دیکشنری و یا یک معلم زبان کمک و راهنمایی بگیرید. در اکثر مواقع کتاب های گرامر و دیکشنری نیاز شما را برآورده می کنند.

فراموش نکنید ۸۰٪ وقت و انرژی خود را صرف مطالعه و آمادگی بیشتر و تمرین کنید. و در حدود ۲۰٪ آن را به تست زنی اختصاص دهید. در هفته های آخر قبل آزمون اصلی تا هفته ای ۲ تست هم مجاز است.

تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس قسمت یازدهم

Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.

In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.

The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for school teachers to speak to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.

In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.(287 words, band 9)

تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

نمونه سوالات رايتينگ آيلتس قسمت دهم

The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

It is true that many older people believe in traditional values that often seem incompatible with the needs of younger people. While I agree that some traditional ideas are outdated, I believe that others are still useful and should not be forgotten.

On the one hand, many of the ideas that elderly people have about life are becoming less relevant for younger people. In the past, for example, people were advised to learn a profession and find a secure job for life, but today’s workers expect much more variety and diversity from their careers. At the same time, the ‘rules’ around relationships are being eroded as young adults make their own choices about who and when to marry. But perhaps the greatest disparity between the generations can be seen in their attitudes towards gender roles. The traditional roles of men and women, as breadwinners and housewives, are no longer accepted as necessary or appropriate by younger people.

On the other hand, some traditional views and values are certainly applicable to the modern world. For example, older generations attach great importance to working hard, doing one’s best, and taking pride in one’s work, and these behaviors can surely benefit young people as they enter today’s competitive job market. Other characteristics that are perhaps seen as traditional are politeness and good manners. In our globalized world, young adults can expect to come into contact with people from a huge variety of backgrounds, and it is more important than ever to treat others with respect. Finally, I believe that young people would lead happier lives if they had a more ‘old-fashioned’ sense of community and neighborliness.

In conclusion, although the views of older people may sometimes seem unhelpful in today’s world, we should not dismiss all traditional ideas as irrelevant.
(۲۹۹ words, band 9)

تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

نمونه سوالات رايتينگ آيلتس قسمت نهم

Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?

It is true that foreign films are more popular in many countries than domestically produced films. There could be several reasons why this is the case, and I believe that governments should promote local film-making by subsidizing the industry.

There are various reasons why many people find foreign films more enjoyable than the films produced in their own countries. Firstly, the established film industries in certain countries have huge budgets for action, special effects and to shoot scenes in spectacular locations. Hollywood blockbusters like ‘Avatar’ or the James Bond films are examples of such productions, and their global appeal is undeniable. Another reason why these big-budget films are so successful is that they often star the most famous actors and actresses, and they are made by the most accomplished producers and directors. The poor quality, low-budget filmmaking in many countries suffers in comparison.

In my view, governments should support local film industries financially. In every country, there may be talented amateur film-makers who just need to be given the opportunity to prove themselves. To compete with big-budget productions from overseas, these people need money to pay for film crews, actors and a host of other costs related to producing high-quality films. If governments did help with these costs, they would see an increase in employment in the film industry, income from film sales, and perhaps even a rise in tourist numbers. New Zealand, for example, has seen an increase in tourism related to the ‘Lord of the Rings’ films, which were partly funded by government subsidies.

In conclusion, I believe that increased financial support could help to raise the quality of locally made films and allow them to compete with the foreign productions that currently dominate the market.(294 words, band 9)