تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

سوالات آیلتس اسپیکینگ می ۲۰۱۷ ازبکستان

Speaking test

Interview

  • What is your name?
  • Where are you from?
  • Can I see your ID?
  • Do you work or study?
  • Describe the place where you live.
  • Is it easy to get there?
  • What kind of transportation do you use?
  • What kind of shoes do you prefer: fashionable or comfortable?
  • Is it good to have a lot of shoes?

Cue Card

Talk about an occasion on which you had to try a new activity for the first time.

Please say

  • What kind of activity was it?
  • Where did it happen?
  • Why did it happen?
  • Explain what you learn from that experience.

Discussion

  • Why do people try dangerous sports?
  • Do people in your country try these sports?
  • Should they think about their families?
  • What can be done to replace dangerous sports with some other activities?
تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس قسمت دوازدهم

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.

There are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. They may assert that university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. Finally, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.

In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. In my opinion, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Besides, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology.

In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.(297 words, band 9)

تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

تست زدن و نحوه ی رفع اشکال

حتما برای چند بار اول که تست خواندن/Reading و درک مطلب بزنید، به این نتیجه می رسید که با روش خواندن ابتدا تا انتهای متن و بعد پاسخ گویی به سوالات و یا بالعکس (خواندن سوالات ابتدا و سپس پیدا کردن جواب در متن – که البته این روش بیشتر توصیه می شود و مفیدتر و سریع تر است – تفاوت زمانی چندانی ندارد و تقریبا باز هم وقت کم می آورید.

خبر خوب آن که این امر کاملا طبیعی است. دو نکته را مد نظر داشته باشید:
اول آن که پیشرفت در خواندن و کم کردن زمان در مهارت خواندن و درک مطلب به طرز قابل توجهی دیرتر از مهارت های دیگر اتفاق می افتد. به عنوان مثال بعد از دو ماه تمرین در مهارت شنیدن، پیشرفت شما به مراتب چشم گیرتر از دو ماه تمرین در مهارت خواندن خواهد بود. بنابراین باید زمان بیشتری را به خواندن اختصاص بدهید تا پیشرفت در این مهارت سریع تر رخ بدهد.

دوم آن که کاهش زمان به یک باره رخ نمی دهد و شما باید سعی کنید پس از هر بار تست زنی، البته در شرایط امتحانی، چند دقیقه از زمان خود کم کنید. دقت داشته باشید که کم کردن زمان فقط با مدیریت زمان ممکن است. به عنوان مثال سوالی که بیش از دو یا سه دقیقه وقت شما را گرفته است را رها کنید و بعدا اگر زمان داشتید و یا در پایان تست به آن مراجعه کنید.

در نهایت پس از مثلا بیست بار تمرین و تست زنی با کمک این تکنیک ها، شما به تدریج در مهارت خواندن به زمان کم تری نیاز داشته باشید.

هر روز یا حتی یک روز در میان تست آزمایشی نزنید. هفته ای یک تست آزمایشی کافی است. در این فاصله مطالعه و رفع اشکال کنید.

بعد از هر تست آزمایشی حتما دلایل اشتباهات خود را ریشه یابی کنید و درصورت لزوم حتما از یک کتاب گرامر، کتاب لغت مرتبط، دیکشنری و یا یک معلم زبان کمک و راهنمایی بگیرید. در اکثر مواقع کتاب های گرامر و دیکشنری نیاز شما را برآورده می کنند.

فراموش نکنید ۸۰٪ وقت و انرژی خود را صرف مطالعه و آمادگی بیشتر و تمرین کنید. و در حدود ۲۰٪ آن را به تست زنی اختصاص دهید. در هفته های آخر قبل آزمون اصلی تا هفته ای ۲ تست هم مجاز است.

تدریس خصوصی آیلتس

نمونه رایتینگ آیلتس قسمت یازدهم

Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal, productive members of society. I completely agree with the idea that allowing such people to speak to teenagers about their experiences is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law.

In my opinion, teenagers are more likely to accept advice from someone who can speak from experience. Reformed offenders can tell young people about how they became involved in crime, the dangers of a criminal lifestyle, and what life in prison is really like. They can also dispel any ideas that teenagers may have about criminals leading glamorous lives. While adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older people, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories of an ex-offender. The vivid and perhaps shocking nature of these stories is likely to have a powerful impact.

The alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate teenagers about crime would be much less effective. One option would be for police officers to visit schools and talk to young people. This could be useful in terms of informing teens about what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but young people are often reluctant to take advice from figures of authority. A second option would be for school teachers to speak to their students about crime, but I doubt that students would see teachers as credible sources of information about this topic. Finally, educational films might be informative, but there would be no opportunity for young people to interact and ask questions.

In conclusion, I fully support the view that people who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence could help to deter teenagers from committing crimes.(287 words, band 9)